In early February of 2012, a middle-school in Portland,
Oregon banned hugging amongst students.
The principal enforced the ban after it was alleged that
hugging had reached viral proportions in the school. Girls were screaming and
running to hug each other from opposite ends of the hall. Students were getting
to class late because they were lingering in the halls to hug. And worryingly, hugging
turned to bullying as groups of students converged on uncool kids and hugged
them as a form of public degradation. Groups of girls made a sport of hugging
pubescent boys to see how long it took them to get aroused.
I don’t have a solution to fix these problems, but I do believe
there are two issues here worth serious discussion: the way we are raised to deal
with physical contact, and bullying.
I’ll start this off by stating that I’m not a serial hugger.
In fact, I found physical contact so awkward during my teenage years that I
would consciously try to avoid hugging my friends (family was ok). I was always
secretly envious of the girls at school who would carelessly hug and touch each
other without it being construed as something sexual. There was an innocent
intimacy about it that I could never emulate, being hyper self-conscious of
touching anyone in any way, lest it be misinterpreted. Yet I craved it, because
like billions of other human beings, I desired meaningful, non-sexual physical
contact without being judged.
I don’t think I’m alone in having experienced uncertainty
about physical contact. I believe our attitude towards it is determined in part
by the way we are raised and also the way we interpret the values endorsed by
media. Many families, despite being deeply loving and caring, are not
physically demonstrative towards each other beyond hello and goodbye hugs or
kisses. As kids become savvier at an earlier age and are exposed to things
which previous generations didn’t learn about until near adult-hood, society as
a whole increasingly seems to be laced with overtones of sex. Media outlets are
sustained by stories of sex and violence, reinforcing over and over again their
agenda of fear-mongering, and strengthening the perception that our society is
more perverted and dangerous than it actually is.
Nowadays, men fear going near children to hug or kiss or
play with them, because society has made them out to be paedophiles. In western
societies, contact between two girls or two boys is readily labelled as gay,
albeit often in a joking way. One of my best friends, who happens to be
straight and Indian, described to me his amusement one day when an Australian
friend told him it wasn’t ok to walk arm in arm down the street with his male
cousin. My friend was puzzled, saying that it was his cousin who he loved
dearly, and what could be more natural? The Aussie friend was emphatic.
Male-male affection: not ok.
Like most teenagers, I lacked the interest and ability to
critically interpret the information given to me by mainstream media, and
therefore when there was the chance of physical contact with anyone I wasn’t
related to, my brain was quick to provide me with the appropriate
media-endorsed references: Gay. Pervert. Interested. Feeler. Lesbian. Crush. Dirty.
Suspect. The list goes on….and on, and on. I’m sure you could add to it.
When did we lose the ability to experience touch in a non-sexual
and non-violent light? This is something I believe there needs to be more
education around, particularly for kids. Touch, within safe and respectful
boundaries, can be healing, therapeutic, nurturing, empowering, comforting, sustaining,
playful, enjoyable and fun. There are branches of medicine founded on the
healing capacity of touch. As babies and children we are raised on loving touch,
and then BAM! It’s gone, and we are suddenly told it’s not ok and made to feel
ashamed of our desires. Banning hugging (the harmless, fun kind) in schools is
just one more voice saying that physical contact is not ok and somehow unsafe.
And they’re teenagers for crying out loud. They’re going to
want to hug. A lot. Educate them instead of repressing and punishing them. Teach
them about respect, responsibility and the positive aspects of physical
contact. Surely if we’ve learnt anything from things like the gay rights
movement, it is that repressing human nature is a terrible, destructive idea.
Educate to promote the behaviour you want; don’t punish the symptom of
misbehaviour.
The second point to discuss here is bullying. Bullying
exists. It happens in every facet of society, amongst rich and poor, black and
white, old and young. That is unfortunate fact. The way bullies manifest their
cowardly trade, however, is changeable. The tactic, in this case hugging, is
only the outer symptom of the core problem, not the problem itself.
Modes of bullying are like fashion. They come and go in popularity.
Like jeans, the little black dress or the tuxedo, some forms of bullying, such
as name calling, gossip, violence and manipulation, will always be in vogue.
Other forms of bullying, such as malicious hugging, the electric-buzzer
hand-shake and lighting a bag of shit on someone’s front porch then ringing the
bell and running away, are transient. They can be thrown in the bargain bin
along with pedal pushers, rah-rah skirts and men’s denim cut-offs.
The undeniable point is: bullying will always exist, and will
always be rampant in schools. There needs to be more education around it, more
discussion and transparency, less tolerance and fewer band-aid solutions. Students
will find new ways to bully once hugging has been banned, and before we know
it, schools will be mini nanny states where self-expression is prohibited and kids
will simply adapt their bullying tactics and find new and innovative ways to
rebel and undermine the system.
It would be nice to hear about schools encouraging
discussion around physical contact, sexual identity and bullying, instead of
throwing a big hairy blanket over these issues. In my experience, kids want to
learn and talk about these issues. It’s adults that have the problem with it.
Enlightenment can only come through education, and if our education
institutions refuse to do this, we’re not giving kids the chance to grow into
informed, intelligent and responsible adults.
Give them a chance. I promise you they’re more open-minded
than you think.
This is a link to a website aimed at youths around 14-24. Amongst other things, it discusses how life and
relationships would be different they taught conscious sex education in high
school instead of just the mechanics: http://www.sexandconsciousness.com.au/youth-program/